JIDAM
CASE REPORT
eISSN 2582 - 0559
“An Official Journal of IDA - Madras Branch”©2019.
Available online
CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH
SIZE ARCH LENGTH DISCREPANCIES-A
REPORT OF TWO CASES
Dr. Shekar Shobana, Dr Krishnan Amudhalakshmi*
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics,
SRM Dental College and Hospital, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
* Department of Dental Surgery, Government Vellore Medical College and Hospital, Tamilnadu, India.
BSTRACT
ngth discrepancies ideally require
ut in certain exceptional cases like
To access & cite t
ssive periodontitis, pathological
Website: jidam.ida
liance of the patient to undergo
ic procedure, the scenario demands
ine treatment approaches and to
t plan based on the patient’s needs.
o cases: midline diastema in
to pathological migration managed
ned by fiber reinforced composite
case discusses anterior crowding
by a fixed partial denture and the
DOI:10.37841/jidam_2
ned by fiber reinforced composite
etic
transformation,
cosmetic
forced composite, natural tooth
Address for correspondence:
Dr Shekar Shobana, MDS.,
No 4, 6th Avenue, Ramakrishna Nagar, Porur,
Chennai- 600 116
E mail id: drshobana.bds@gmail.com
Received - 26.7.2019
Accepted - 12.9.2019
Published - 27.12.2019
32
JIDAM/Volume:7/Issue:1/Pages 32 - 37/January - March 2020
Shobana et al : Management of tooth size arch length discrepancies
INTRODUCTION
First appointment:
The face is the most important part of the body when
During the first visit, a study model was taken to assess the
determining physical attractiveness and the order of
patient’s overjet and overbite relation. The maxillary and
increasing importance is the nose, facial structure, eyes and
mandibular anteriors were in normal overbite relation,
the mouth respectively.1 Aesthetics being a subjective factor,
whereas overjet was increased measuring about 4mm. Then
is often necessary to formulate treatment plan according to
the mesiodistal width of the mandibular centrals was
the patient’s requirement, within a short period of time. The
measured accurately using calipers to assess the amount of
condition might necessitate deviation from the established
tooth preparation required to accommodate the acrylic
clinical protocols and achieve optimal aesthetics meanwhile
pontic. A suitable acrylic teeth was selected after shade
adhering to the principles of minimal intervention.
matching.
Crowding and spacing of teeth are the two most
Electric pulp testing for
41 exhibited normal
commonly encountered malocclusion problems. These cases
response whereas 31 exhibited delayed response. On clinical
are usually treated by orthodontic correction. In exceptional
examination
31 revealed grade II mobility and gingival
cases, it may be necessary to manage the above mentioned
recession. Intentional root canal treatment was planned for
conditions conservatively. This case report describes
31.
management of two common malocclusion(s) - crowding
and spacing managed by conservative aesthetic approach.
Digital Vernier calipers were used to measure the
First case discusses lower anterior spacing due to
space and mesio distal dimension of 41 and 31 which was
pathological migration managed
tively. This gave a total of 14 mm
retained by fiber reinforced com
f 31, 41 and diastema). It was thus
describes the management of
mesio distal dimension of 4.6 mm
anteriors with mesiodens by extr
c denture pontic. As 31 was to be
and restoration with a fixed partial
ore reduction was planned in 31
mandibular anteriors was man
be stripped ultra conservatively
malposed teeth which was retai
spect to create a total space of 4.6
natural tooth pontic. Cosmetic r
ure pontic. Thus 31 and 41 in the
composite restoration was done.
ere stripped proximally and the
pontic was also trimmed to check
CASE REPORT 1
A 27 year old female
Department of Conservative Den
referred from the Department of
d visit, intentional single visit root
management of spacing in the low
in 31.
pathological migration of teet
evaluation of
31 and 41. The m
periodontally compromised and
follow-up phase after periodontal
sequent visit
41,31 were stripped
the lower anterior region was of
e proximal aspect to accommodate
patient that raised the need for aesthetic intervention.
the acrylic pontic [Fig 1(b)]. Space of approximately 0.5 mm
should exist between the pontic and the abutment teeth,
Intra-oral Examination:
which provides additional bulk of composite material and
hence stronger connectors.2
Intra-oral examination revealed localized aggressive
periodontitis involving 31, 41 with pathological migration
Under rubber dam isolation using the split dam
[Fig.1(a)] which revealed a space of 3.5 mm between the
technique, Class III cavities were prepared in 31 and 41
mandibular central incisors as measured with digital
[Fig.1(c)] from the lingual approach. The cavities were
calipers. The patient’s periodontal condition precluded the
etched for 20 seconds using 37% orthophosphoric acid (N-
use of 31,41 as abutments for fixed prosthesis whereas the
Etch, Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichenstein, Germany), rinsed for
spacing posed a potential threat to patient’s aesthetics. As an
20 seconds and air dried. Bonding agent (Tetric-N-Bond,
interim management it was planned to close the space by
Total Etch Dental Adhesive, Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichenstein,
using acrylic tooth pontic stabilized with fibre reinforced
Germany) was applied and cured for 10 seconds. The acrylic
composite.
tooth pontic was positioned and stabilized from labial aspect
with flowable light cured composite resin
(Te-Econom
Treatment plan:
Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichenstein, Germany). The
acrylic pontic was prepared as to maintain a modified ridge
lap relation with the alveolar ridge.
33
JIDAM/Volume: 7/Issue: 1/Pages 32 - 37/January - March 2020
Shobana et al : Management of tooth size arch length discrepancies
maxillary mesiodens and missing 11, Ellis class II fracture in
The desired length of the glass impregnated braided
41.
fiber reinforced composite (Interlig, Angelus, Londrina, PR
Brazil) was measured and cut. The class III cavities in 31
and 41 were coated with flowable composite to ensure
maximum wetting of the fiber and was stabilized in position
using a Teflon coated composite instrument. The material
was then light cured for 40 seconds [Fig.1(d)]. A second
increment of flowable composite was added and again light
cured for 40 seconds. Final finishing was done with Optra
Pol (Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichenstein, Germany)
[Fig1(e)].
The post-operative image shows the acrylic tooth pontic in
place [Fig 1(f)].
Fig 2(a): Pre-operative labial view. Fig 2(b): Pre-operative
lingual view Fig
2(c): Labial view after extraction of
mesiodens. Fig 2(d): Intentional RCT in 12, 21, 22. Fig 2(e):
Mock tooth preparation on diagnostic cast. Fig 2(f): Mock
nostic cast. Fig 2(g): Silicone putty
ck wax up. Fig 2(h): Silicone putty
tooth preparation. Fig 2(i): Lines
he teeth lying within the arch form
Fig 1(a): Pre-operative facial view
; blue, yellow and red lines denote
of the lower anteriors . Fig 1(b): Se
ning of 22,12 and 21 respectively
the acrylic tooth as pontic. Fig 1(c)
rm which will requires elective
cavities in 31 and 41 for placemen
abutments within the desired arch
Fig 1(d): Acrylic tooth pontic try
ed crown preparation in 12,11,21.
Fig 1(e): Lingual view of the re
he secondary cast
Labial view of the acrylic pontic
dure:
CASE REPORT 2
tment plan was as follows: For the
A 23-year old male patient
l root canal treatment in 12,21,22,
complaint of crowded upper and l
fixed partial denture in 12,21,22.
referred from the Department of O
: extraction of
32, the crown of
was not willing for comprehensiv
FRC retained natural tooth pontic,
The patient was seeking aestheti
nd light cure composite restoration
duration of treatment and financial constraints were
oral prophylaxis, extraction of
exercising a great influence on the treatment plan.
mesiodens was done [Fig 2(c)] followed by intentional root
canal treatment of 12,21,22 (Fig 2(d)]. This was followed by
Extra-oral examination revealed that the patients
the extraction of the maxillary mesiodens. Using the
profile and divergence were within normal limits. No
diagnostic casts as guidance, mock tooth preparation was
skeletal malocclusion was evident.
done on the study model [Fig 2(e)] and a mock-up wax
pattern was made with the mockup wax
[Fig
2(f)]. A
Intra-oral examination:
silicone putty index was made over the mockup to guide the
tooth preparation [Fig 2(g)] and also to determine the facial
Intra-oral examination revealed the presence of
and incisal position of the final restoration. The putty index
severe crowding of maxillary anteriors. Patient gives recent
was placed periodically over the abutment teeth during
history of extraction of 11 which was labially placed. 21 was
preparation to assess the amount of clearance obtained and
disto labially rotated along its long axis and mesiodens was
also to conserve tooth structure that was lingually inclined
present. Mandibular anteriors were crowded with gingival
[Fig 2(h)]. Figure 2(i) is a depiction of the analysis of the
recession in 31, 41 and Ellis class II fracture was present in
relative labio-lingual positioning of teeth. Fig 2(j) shows the
41 which was labially malposed [Fig 2(a) & (b)]. Overjet
completed tooth preparation done with the putty index as the
and overbite were within acceptable ranges. The case was
guide. Impressions were recorded with elastomeric
diagnosed as Angle’s Class I molar relation with crowded
impression materials and the secondary casts were
maxillary and mandibular anteriors and the presence of
articulated [Fig 2 (k)]. Porcelain fused to metal crowns were
fabricated and cementation was done with Fuji Type I glass
34
JIDAM/Volume: 7/Issue: 1/Pages 32 - 37/January - March 2020
Shobana et al : Management of tooth size arch length discrepancies
ionomer luting cement
(GC, Tokyo, Japan).
13 was
duration makes alternative options like recontouring and
recontoured and restored with light cure composite
direct restorations feasible.5,6 The patient’s choice of
restoration to mimic 12 (TetricN-Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent,
treatment is a vital element for the success of any procedure
Leichenstein, Germany).
as it involves the psychological, physical and financial
dimension of the individual.7
Case
1: In the first case, there was localized
aggressive periodontitis of the lower anteriors and the
patient was in the follow-up phase of treatment. An interim
aesthetic procedure was needed before a definitive treatment
could be instituted.
Case
2: In the second case, owing to patient’s
aesthetic needs and non-compliance towards orthodontic
treatment a conservative management was planned.
Fig 3(a): Extraction of the lingually aligned 32. Fig 3(b):
Mesiodens was extracted and fixed partial denture was
Extracted tooth stored in sterile saline. Fig
3(c): Natural
planned using 12, 21 and 22 as abutments to replace 11, 21,
tooth pontic prepared proximally to fit in the space between
22. Aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary technique (APT) is
31 and
33. Fig
3(d): Decoronation and lingual slot
usually used to guide tooth preparation for veneers.8 In this
preparation of natural tooth pontic 32. Fig 3(e): Class III
case, the silicon putty index served as a guide to tooth
cavity preparation in 31 and 33.
preparation depth as the abutments
composite retained natural tooth po
reparations due to severe rotation.
aesthetic transformation is a well
the literature.3,9,10,11 In this case, 13
Under local anaesthesia w
ic
12 by additive technique with
(Lignox, Warren pharmaceuticals
echnique is both biologically and
done [Fig 3(a)] and stored in steri
nd requires less appointments.10
extracted tooth was decoronated a
debrided. The prepared tooth wa
s, it was not possible to establish
until further use. After one week, th
ry. Pinho et al12 has stated that
proximally sliced to fit into the ex
ceptible when equal to or greater
and the pulp chamber was seal
ists and
3 mm for Prosthodontists
Cement (Fuji II, GC Tokyo, Ja
make no detections in midline
measuring 2 mm was placed on the
al13 has concluded from his study
3(d)]. Under rubber dam isolation
ble deviation variations for smile
prepared on the mesial and dis
, and practitioners should avoid
respectively [Fig 3(e)] and FRC ret
patients to minor discrepancies”.
was done as previously discusse
operative and post-operative comp
composites (FRC) are used as long
Figures 4 (a), (b) and (c) respective
ey overcome the drawbacks of
like low fracture resistance and
resilience. Many investigators have confirmed the
reinforcing effect of FRCs on different polymer types14,15
This reinforcing effect can be attributed to the transfer of
stresses from the weak polymer matrix to the fibers with
high tensile strength.16 In the present case, Interlig (Angelus)
was used, which is an impregnated, braided, glass fiber
reinforced composite with the ability to dissipate forces in
all directions. Glass fibers are treated with silane chemical
coupling agent to allow dental resins to chemically adhere to
the glass fiber strands.17 Kolbeck et al reported that glass
fibers performed better than polyethylene fibers due to pre-
Fig 4(a): Pre-operative labial view. Fig 4(b): Post-operative
labial view. Fig 4(c): Post-operative profile view
impregnation with light cured composite which ensures a
good bond with the composite resin making Intelig
(Angelus) the ideal material of choice in this case.18
DISCUSSION
In case
1, there was spacing due to pathological
Even though multidisciplinary treatment is the key
migration related to localized aggressive periodontitis of the
to establish an ideal and a perfect smile component,3,4 the
mandibular anteriors, not associated with tooth loss. A
need to attend to the patient’s aesthetics within a short
definitive management in this case would be an implant or
35
JIDAM/Volume: 7/Issue: 1/Pages 32 - 37/January - March 2020
Shobana et al : Management of tooth size arch length discrepancies
fixed partial denture. But due to the poor prognosis of the
evaluation form. Dent Clin North Am
2011;
abutment teeth (31,41), placement of a fixed prosthesis or
55(2):
187-209.
implant was contraindicated in that region because of the
5.
Dietschi D. Optimizing smile composition and
existing pathological destructive process in the bone. So this
esthetics
with resin composites and other
case became an ideal candidate for acrylic pontic and FRC
conservative esthetic procedures. Eur J Esthet
resin. A chairside FRC prosthesis offers a fast, minimally
Dent 2008;3(1):14-29.
invasive approach for tooth replacement that combines all of
the benefits of the FRC material for aesthetic, functional and
6.
Mathias P, Freitas da Silva EV, Aguiar TR
potentially durable result. An acrylic tooth or a natural tooth
,Andrade AS, Azevedo J.A Conservative esthetic
(in the case of extraction of a periodontally-involved incisor)
approach using enamel recontouring and composite
can be used as a pontic.
resin restorations. Case Rep Dent
2016; 2016: 1-5.
FRC has an acceptable strength because of good
7.
Chu CH, Zhang CF, Jin LJ. Treating a maxillary
integration of fibers with the composite resin, leading to
midline diastema in adult patients—a general
clinical longevity and can be completed in a single
dentist’s perspective. J Am Dental Ass
2011;
appointment. In addition, the appliance can easily be
142(11):
1258-1264.
repaired in case of fracture due to wear and tear. Moreover,
it meets patients’ aesthetic expectation1.9
8.
Gurel G, Morimoto S, Calamita MA, Coachman
C, Sesma N. Clinical Performance of Porcelain
CONCLUSION
Laminate Veneers: Outcomes of the Aesthetic Pre-
rary
(APT) Technique. Int J
Aesthetic dentistry is purely
rative Dent 2012;32:625-635.
patients dictates the choice of tre
discretionary income. The succes
sformation of a lateral incisor to
depends on motivation and aesthe
with a ceramometal crown. Rev
emotional. It would be prudent to
989 Sep-Oct;18(5):385-93.
clinical decision making coupl
principles of aesthetics helps to ac
Atzeri G, Collares FM, Hirata
outcomes and aids in establishing
ntouring for achieving anterior
span of time.
thet Dent
2019;14(2):134-146.
tzikos T, Shamus IL . Esthetic
FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND
am approach. N Y State Dent J
SPONSORSHIP:
Nil
, Faber J, Lenza MA . Impact
tries on the perception of smile
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
3.
There are no conflicts of interest.
Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel
REFERENCES
S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the
layperson’s perspective : a computer based surve-
1.
Patzer
GL. The Physical
Attractiveness
J Am Dent Assoc 2008 Oct; 139(10):1318-27.
Phenomena. New York: Plenum Press, 1985;69-70.
14. Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R,
2.
Mishra N, Jurel SK, Singh RD. Glass fiber
Handel G. In-vitro study of fracture strength and
reinforced bridge using acrylic denture tooth
marginal
adaptation
of
polyethylene-fiber
pontic- A multidisciplinary approach. Int J Pros
reinforced- composite versus glass-fiber-reinforced-
Dent 2013:4(2):56-59.
composite fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil
2002;29:668-74.
3.
Claman L, Alfaro MA, Mercado A. An
interdisciplinary approach for improved esthetic
15. Aydin C, Yilmaz A, Caglar A. Effect of glass
results in the anterior maxilla. J Pros Dent
reinforcement on the flexural strength of denture
2003;89(1):1-5.
base resin. Quintessence Int 2002;33:457-63.
4.
Calamia JR, Levine JB, Lipp M, Cisneros G,
16. Nohrstrom TJ, Valittu PK, Yli-Urpo A. The effect
Wolff MS. Smile design and treatment planning
of placement and quantity of glass fibers on the
with the help of a comprehensive esthetic
fracture resistance of interim fixed partial
dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:72-8.
36
JIDAM/Volume: 7/Issue: 1/Pages 32 - 37/January - March 2020
Shobana et al : Management of tooth size arch length discrepancies
17. Strassler HE, Tomona N & Spitzangel JK.
Stabilizing periodontally compromised teeth with
fiber-reinforced composite resin.
Dent Today
2003; 22(9):102-104.
18. Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. In-
vitro study of fracture strength and marginal
adaptation
of
polyethylene-fiber-reinforced
composite versus glass-fiber-reinforced-composite
fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:668-
74.
19. Karman AI, Kir N, Belli S. Four applications of
reinforced
polyethylene
fiber
material
in
orthodontic
practice. Am
J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop 2002;121:650-4.
37
JIDAM/Volume: 7/Issue: 1/Pages 32 - 37/January - March 2020